Is Claude 4.5 Haiku or Claude 4.5 Sonnet cheaper?

For a typical request (10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens), Claude 4.5 Haiku is cheaper — about 67% less, or roughly $4000 saved per 100,000 requests. Claude 4.5 Haiku runs $1/$5 per 1M input/output tokens; Claude 4.5 Sonnet runs $3/$15.

Which has the larger context window?

Both support a 200,000-token context window.

How accurate are these token counts?

Claude 4.5 Haiku: Approximated with cl100k_base — drift typically <2% on English and code. Claude 4.5 Sonnet: Approximated with cl100k_base — drift typically <2% on English and code. The dollar math itself is exact once the token count is known.

Claude 4.5 Haiku vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet: pricing & cost comparison

On input tokens, Claude 4.5 Haiku is the cheaper of the two — 67% less per million ($1 vs $3). On output, Claude 4.5 Haiku is 67% cheaper ($5 vs $15) — and since output is usually the dominant cost driver, that gap matters more than it looks.

Side by side

	Claude 4.5 Haiku	Claude 4.5 Sonnet
Input / 1M tokens	$1	$3
Output / 1M tokens	$5	$15
Context window	200,000	200,000
Token-count accuracy	±2%	±2%
Cost — 10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens	$0.02	$0.06

What a real request costs

Take a representative turn — 10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens. Claude 4.5 Haiku comes to $0.02, Claude 4.5 Sonnet to $0.06. Across 100,000 requests that's a $4000 swing in favour of Claude 4.5 Haiku. To run the numbers on your actual prompt, paste it into the calculator and toggle Compare across all models.

Same family — pick on price

Moving between Claude 4.5 Haiku and Claude 4.5 Sonnet is a one-line model-string change — same family, same tokenizer, nothing to re-encode. That makes this a straight cost/quality call: send the routine bulk of traffic to Claude 4.5 Haiku ($1/$5 per 1M) and reserve Claude 4.5 Sonnet for the requests that visibly need its extra headroom. On the worked example above that split is worth about 67% per request — small per call, real money once you multiply by volume.

See the full breakdown on the dedicated pages for Claude 4.5 Haiku and Claude 4.5 Sonnet.

FAQ

Is Claude 4.5 Haiku or Claude 4.5 Sonnet cheaper?: For a typical request (10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens), Claude 4.5 Haiku is cheaper — about 67% less, or roughly $4000 saved per 100,000 requests. Claude 4.5 Haiku runs $1/$5 per 1M input/output tokens; Claude 4.5 Sonnet runs $3/$15.
Which has the larger context window?: Both support a 200,000-token context window.
How accurate are these token counts?: Claude 4.5 Haiku: Approximated with cl100k_base — drift typically <2% on English and code. Claude 4.5 Sonnet: Approximated with cl100k_base — drift typically <2% on English and code. The dollar math itself is exact once the token count is known.

Both prices are computed from tokenmath's verified pricing table. Rates sourced from www.anthropic.com, verified 2026-05-09. Vendor pricing changes often — confirm before you commit.