Is Claude 5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini cheaper?

For a typical request (10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens), GPT-4o mini is cheaper — about 93% less, or roughly $3730 saved per 100,000 requests. Claude 5 Sonnet runs $2/$10 per 1M input/output tokens; GPT-4o mini runs $0.15/$0.6.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude 5 Sonnet, at 1,000,000 tokens versus 128,000.

How accurate are these token counts?

Claude 5 Sonnet: Approximated with cl100k_base — drift typically <2% on English and code. GPT-4o mini: Exact tokenization via the canonical OpenAI vocab (o200k_base). The dollar math itself is exact once the token count is known.

Claude 5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o mini: pricing & cost comparison

On input tokens, GPT-4o mini is the cheaper of the two — 93% less per million ($2 vs $0.15). On output, GPT-4o mini is 94% cheaper ($10 vs $0.6) — and since output is usually the dominant cost driver, that gap matters more than it looks.

Side by side

	Claude 5 Sonnet	GPT-4o mini
Input / 1M tokens	$2	$0.15
Output / 1M tokens	$10	$0.6
Context window	1,000,000	128,000
Token-count accuracy	±2%	exact
Cost — 10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens	$0.04	$0.0027

What a real request costs

Take a representative turn — 10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens. Claude 5 Sonnet comes to $0.04, GPT-4o mini to $0.0027. Across 100,000 requests that's a $3730 swing in favour of GPT-4o mini. To run the numbers on your actual prompt, paste it into the calculator and toggle Compare across all models.

Different leagues

These two sit in different price tiers — Claude 5 Sonnet runs roughly 15× the per-request cost of GPT-4o mini on the worked example — so they rarely compete for the same job. Reach for GPT-4o mini on high-volume, latency-sensitive work (classification, extraction, routing) and Claude 5 Sonnet only where the harder reasoning earns its price. They're different vendors, so expect a different API and tokenizer: the OpenAI side counts exactly; the other lands within a few percent — budget a small calibration buffer when you switch.

See the full breakdown on the dedicated pages for Claude 5 Sonnet and GPT-4o mini.

FAQ

Is Claude 5 Sonnet or GPT-4o mini cheaper?: For a typical request (10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens), GPT-4o mini is cheaper — about 93% less, or roughly $3730 saved per 100,000 requests. Claude 5 Sonnet runs $2/$10 per 1M input/output tokens; GPT-4o mini runs $0.15/$0.6.
Which has the larger context window?: Claude 5 Sonnet, at 1,000,000 tokens versus 128,000.
How accurate are these token counts?: Claude 5 Sonnet: Approximated with cl100k_base — drift typically <2% on English and code. GPT-4o mini: Exact tokenization via the canonical OpenAI vocab (o200k_base). The dollar math itself is exact once the token count is known.

Both prices are computed from tokenmath's verified pricing table. Rates sourced from platform.claude.com and openai.com, verified 2026-07-06. Vendor pricing changes often — confirm before you commit.