Skip to main content
tokenmath
Menu

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-4o: pricing & cost comparison

On input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the cheaper of the two — 88% less per million ($0.3 vs $2.5). On output, Gemini 2.5 Flash is 75% cheaper ($2.5 vs $10) — and since output is usually the dominant cost driver, that gap matters more than it looks.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o
Input / 1M tokens$0.3$2.5
Output / 1M tokens$2.5$10
Context window1,000,000128,000
Token-count accuracy±3%exact
Cost — 10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens$0.008$0.045

What a real request costs

Take a representative turn — 10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash comes to $0.008, GPT-4o to $0.045. Across 100,000 requests that's a $3700 swing in favour of Gemini 2.5 Flash. To run the numbers on your actual prompt, paste it into the calculator and toggle Compare across all models.

Which should you pick?

These are different vendors, so a switch means a different API and a slightly different tokenizer — budget a small calibration buffer. GPT-4o give exact counts; the others land within a few percent. See the full breakdown on the dedicated pages for Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-4o.

FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o cheaper?
For a typical request (10,000 input + 2,000 output tokens), Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper — about 82% less, or roughly $3700 saved per 100,000 requests. Gemini 2.5 Flash runs $0.3/$2.5 per 1M input/output tokens; GPT-4o runs $2.5/$10.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash, at 1,000,000 tokens versus 128,000.
How accurate are these token counts?
Gemini 2.5 Flash: Approximated with o200k_base; drift typically ~3% on English and code. GPT-4o: Exact tokenization via the canonical OpenAI vocab (o200k_base). The dollar math itself is exact once the token count is known.

Keyboard shortcuts

Press ? any time to reopen this list.

Show this overlay?
Toggle themet
Focus the prompt textarea/
Go to homegh
Go to modelsgm
Go to pricing datagp
Go to changeloggc
Go to aboutga
Close overlays / dialogsEsc

We use Vercel Web Analytics for aggregate page metrics and (optionally) Microsoft Clarity for masked session replay. Prompt content is never sent. Read the privacy policy.